Subsidy removal: Cash transfer is scam – Kaduna Gov Uba Sani

Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna state, has described the proposed cash transfer policy of the Federal Government as a scam.

Sani stated this while speaking in an interview with Arise Television’s News Night on Friday.

The governor said, “My position has always been that, at this critical time, cash transfer should not be something that we should bring up, completely. I think that cash transfer for me, in my opinion, is a scam. Completely is a scam. I can be very certain about that, because who are you transferring the money to?

“Let me give an example, go and check the current statistics. Like I said, as the Chairman, Committee of  Banking for four years in Nigeria, I oversight Central Bank, I oversight all the commercial sector of our economy for the last four years and I look at the statistics, I will be very firm on this issue and you can go and check it. 

“Let me give an example, go and check the current statistics. Like I said, as the Chairman, Committee of  Banking for four years in Nigeria, I oversight Central Bank, I oversight all the commercial sector of our economy for the last four years and I look at the statistics, I will be very firm on this issue and you can go and check it. 

“About 70 to 75 percent of the rural population in North West are financially excluded completely. You will have to go and check, these people we are talking about are important people in the society. They do not even have a bank account so who are you transferring the money to?

“Let’s try and work very hard to make sure that they are financially included, that is the most important thing and I will like to call on our development partners, the World Bank, to put more money towards bringing more people into the financial services and the vulnerable in particular.

“Let’s put more money to ensure that we open accounts for them, get them involved, if we don’t do that, no matter what we do however you do it, money will go to the wrong people, that’s the fact.”

President Bola Tinubu had earlier unveiled his administration’s plan for a monthly N8,000 transfer to 12 million of the poorest households in the country for six months, in a bid to cushion the effects of the removal of fuel subsidy.

The plan was contained in a letter read last Thursday on the floor of the House of Representatives regarding the $800 million loan request of the previous Muhammadu Buhari administration for a social safety net programme.

But days after the announcement, the Federal Government said it will review the move following the public outcry it generated among Nigerians.

Recall that following the removal of the petrol subsidy and the recent hike in petrol prices to up to N617/litre, the National Executive Council (NEC)  agreed on palliative measures for Nigerians.

NEC also considered integrity tests on state social registers, cash transfers would be done via state social registers subject to state peculiarities.

The Federal Government also initiated a six-month cash award policy for public servants.

According to the Federal Government, food items grains and fertilizers are to be distributed by state governments at the rate acquired from National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), while states were asked to double down on energy transition plans in the transport sector.

Source: Vanguard

Kaduna Gov Kicks As PDP Presents Exhibits Before Tribunal

Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna State Tuesday objected to the admissibility of documents from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) presented by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) before the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal in Kaduna.

The governor also requested the dismissal of the petition brought by the opposition party and its candidate, Hon Mohammed Isah Ashiru, saying it lacked merit.

Governor Sani’s counsel, Chief Duro Adeyele (SAN), did not disclose the grounds for the objection to the admissibility of the documents.

He stated that their valid objection would be presented in written addresses filed before the tribunal.

In compliance with a subpoena issued by the tribunal, INEC tendered documents, including forms EC8A, EC8B, and EC8C, from polling units in nine local government areas: Birnin Gwari, Igabi, Zaria, Sabon Gari, Kaduna North, Kaduna South, Kubau, Lere, and Kudan.

Adeyele and INEC’s counsel, A.M. Aliyu (SAN), argued that the original election documents in INEC’s custody should not have been brought to court.

He stated that the original documents were supposed to remain in the commission’s custody and that any party other than the PDP could request certified true copies of the documents.

In an interview with journalists, PDP’s counsel, Giovanni Laah, stated that they wanted the original documents to remain before the tribunal until they called witnesses.

The tribunal adjourned the sitting to today for the continuation of the hearing.

APC presents witnesses against Kaduna PDP senator

Meanwhile, APC’s senatorial candidate, Muhammed Sani Abdullahi (Dattijo), presented three additional witnesses, who provided documents regarding the educational background of Senator Lawal Usman, the representative of Kaduna Central at the Senate.

The witnesses appeared before a three-man panel, headed by Justice H.H Kereng, at the tribunal on Tuesday. They were cross-examined by M.A. Magaji SAN, the counsel for the PDP.

Mr. Johnson Usman, the counsel to Dattijo, informed journalists after the tribunal’s sitting that the witnesses included those from Aminu Shehu College of Advanced Studies and the principal of Great Diamond School.

He stated that “Aminu Shehu College of Education said his name was not there at all, and the first petitioner himself has testified and tendered documents. Particularly, the letter was written by Demonstration Primary School, Gwagwalada, as well as Government Day Secondary School, Gwagwalada, stating that Lawal Adamu Usman was never a student there.”

He declined further comment, saying it’s left for the court to determine.

In response, M.A. Magaji (SAN), the counsel to the PDP senator, expressed unfamiliarity with the name of the school presented as witnesses.

He asserted their confidence in their mandate and their intention to prove in court that Senator Usman won the election.

Source: Punch

Panel storms Ortom’s automobile workshop, impounds vehicles

The asset recovery committee set up by Benue State Governor, Hyacinth Alia, on Tuesday, stormed the automobile workshop owned by former governor Samuel Ortom with towing vehicles and removed some vehicles.

Alia, through his Chief Press Secretary, Kula Tersoo, recently disclosed that government vehicles, numbering 29, were allegedly looted by the past governor.

Tersoo had said in a statement that “the case of the Goverment House is particularly pitiable with vandalised furniture, window blinds, electronics and other household appliances.

“This is besides the carting away of all vehicles, including an ambulance and A press crew bus, attached to the office of the governor.

“At the last count, 29 vehicles, attached to the governor’s office,  are still no where to be found.”

A source told our correspondent on Tuesday that the asset recovery committee stormed Ortom’s automobile workshop on Tuesday afternoon but were resisted by the workers there.

When contacted, the Publicity Secretary of the  Peoples Democratic Party, Bemgba Iortyom,  confirmed that indeed state agents went to Ortom’s automobile workshop.

Iortyom said, “Governor Alia has now sent towing trucks to ex-Governor Ortom’s automobile workshop to cart away vehicles, after attempts to drive them away failed.”

It will be recalled that Ortom and his deputy, Benson Abounu, secured  a court order restraining the asset recovery committee from coming after them.

In the suit, marked MHC/199/2023, filed through their lawyer, Douglas Pepe (SAN), Ortom and Abounu asked the court to  determine “whether  property legitimately allocated to them as entitlements and remuneration can  be considered as state government assets.”

They are seeking “a determination of court whether or not by the combined effect of sections 5(2), 44, 318(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), the executive actions and decisions of the Governor and Government of Benue State taken by  Ortom and Abounu and the State Executive Council, in good faith before May 29th, 2023, were valid.”

The ex-governor and his deputy also want the court to determine “whether or not the Governor of Benue State is not bound by the constitutional approvals made by his predecessor.”

They are contending that the asset recovery committee set up by Alia has no power to interfere with their rights to own property “vested in them by the Benue State Government at all material times or without following due process.”

Source: Punch

We inherited N307 billion debt from Lalong’s administration – Mutfwang

Governor Caleb Mutfwang of Plateau State has announced that his administration inherited a debt burden of N307 billion from the immediate past administration in the state.

The governor announced this shortly after receiving the reports of the committees on the Transition and Strategic Development Framework for Plateau State on Monday in Jos.

Prof. Ganyir Lombin headed the two committees.

The governor voiced his determination to take the state to greater heights despite its huge debt profile.

Mutfwang particularly expressed his readiness to tackle the current security challenges in the state.

“Throughout the campaign season, we were under the mistaken belief that our debt burden was around N200 billion; to hear that it is N307 billion is quite intimidating and worrisome,” he said.

The governor pledged to meticulously study the document presented to him, adding that further investigation would also be conducted with appropriate action taken after that.

Earlier, Lombin explained that some operational challenges prevented the two committees, which had appointees of the past administration as members, from jointly presenting their report.

He noted that the handover notes presented to the governor on May 29 differed from the agreed template developed by the joint committee.

Source: Daily Post

How southern Kaduna ‘elders’ humiliated my deputies – El-Rufai

Nasir El Rufai, the immediate former governor of Kaduna State, said elders from the southern part of the state humiliated his deputies who were from the zone.

Mr El Rufai also explained how he decided to pick a Muslim woman from the zone as his running mate.

Mr El Rufai made the statement while delivering a keynote address during the book launch and retirement event in honour of Ishaq Akintola, the founder of Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) on Saturday.

Kaduna is divided into three senatorial zones. While residents of Kaduna North and Central are predominantly Muslim, residents of Southern Kaduna are mainly Christians.

Muslim governors of the state traditionally have Christian deputies from Southern Kaduna.

Humiliated deputies

Mr El Rufai, who served for two terms from 2015 to 2023, said in the first tenure, he picked his long-term friend, Barbanas Bala, a southern Kaduna Christian, ”but was almost frustrated out of office in the first two years”.

He said some unamed southern Kaduna elders were angry with him for not accepting a list of prospective deputy governor candidates from people he called “self-appointed, so-called Southern Kaduna Christian elders”.

He also said Mr Bala was hated for coming from a minority ethnic group, Moroa, and not the Atyap, Bajju, Jaba or Kagoro which led to some of them calling Mr Bala a “sellout”.

“Nothing prepared either Bantex or I for the viciousness with which he was treated by the constituency he was meant to be represented by his presence on the governorship ticket. He offered thrice to resign from office within our first two years in office. Bantex therefore barely made it to the end of our first term, psychologically battered by the hostility and hobbled by a resurgence of ill-health… Bantex lost his bid to represent the Kaduna South Senatorial District in the 2019 election. We lost him a year or so later,” he said.

The former federal capital territory minister said what happened to Mr Bala made him change his mind in selecting a running mate in 2019.

He said the decision to have a southern Kaduna Christian as a deputy governor in the state has not led to the desired unity and progress.

He said he decided to settle for a Muslim Southern Kaduna woman, Hadiza Balarabe, but the hostilities didn’t cease.

“For the 2019 election, my choice of running mate followed the established pattern, except in two particulars: gender and religion. Dr Hadiza Balarabe is from a minority ethnic group (Gwantu) in southern Kaduna, but she is a woman and a Muslim.

“Her choice met with the usual hostility from the same persons that had so battered and demoralised Bantex, my first deputy. But it demonstrated that not everyone who mouths diversity and inclusion is actually interested in those values. The first woman to be elected as deputy governor from the far north of Nigeria was not seen as a pathfinder, a breakthrough for gender and a reaffirmation of the possibility of democracy to elect persons from minority and excluded groups. Only one marker of identity seemed to matter in such quarters. But the fact that Bantex had that marker – religion – had saved neither him nor I from opprobrium,” he said.

Mr El Rufai said that despite being of the same faith as Mrs Balarabe, their administration was dedicated to the equality of all people of the state.

“Dr Hadiza Balarabe and I ran a government dedicated to the equality of persons, resolutely pursuing the policy of common citizenship. Despite sharing the same faith, we were bound by the injunctions of our Islamic faith, our oaths of office and our societal values to exercise our duties with fairness and justice. Electing persons of the same faith is neither a threat to the rights of others nor a blow to inclusion: it may only have highlighted other identities that tend to be excluded, as we did in Kaduna State.

“If we want our citizens to invest in common causes, to work in mutual endeavours for progress, to build a society of merit, hard work and fairness, we must deemphasise religion and region, and their vicious twin ethnicity, in making political decisions and choices. Let us build a society centred around citizens, who can live and pursue livelihoods everywhere, with constitutional rights that apply to all,” he added.

Mr El Rufai faced criticism, especially from the southern Kaduna part when he settled for Mrs Balarabe as his running mate in 2019.

Source: Premium Times

Nigeria witnessed worst phase of corruption under Buhari – Kukah

The Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Sokoto, Matthew Kukah, has said that Nigeria witnessed the worst phase of corruption during the last administration led by President Muhammadu Buhari.

Kukah stated this while delivering a keynote speech at the 60th call to bar anniversary celebration of legal icon, Aare Afe Babalola, in Ado Ekiti on Monday.

The cleric noted that corruption did not start under Buhari, but that his administration amplified it morally and financially.

He said, “We have seen the worst phase of corruption in Nigeria. Femi Falana, my friend here, will speak about that because he has published a series of articles talking about what happened under the Buhari administration.

“They were not the ones who caused corruption but I think in the last administration, we saw the ugliest phase of corruption whether in moral terms, financial terms and other terms,” he said.

Kukah lamented that Nigeria is sharing its sovereignty which is guaranteed in the constitution with bandits and other terrorists.

The clergyman expressed worry that Nigerian is literally being held hostage by people who threaten the very existence of our democracy and country.

According to him, a lot of Nigerians have lost faith in the judiciary.

He described the judiciary as a victim the same way every other institution in Nigeria is suffering a crisis.

According to him, Nigeria should not yet assume that it is a democracy but instead assume that it is matching towards democracy, which means rebuilding Nigeria “after the kind of mess the last administration has left the country.”

The Bishop, however, said it is time to rebuild the country, adding that Nigerians have put the “ugly past” behind them, following the outcome of the 2023 general elections.

Source: Vanguard

Southern Kaduna like blacks in South Africa’s apartheid – Shehu Sani

Senator Shehu Sani, a former lawmaker has described the situation of the people of Southern Kaduna under the leadership of APC in the state in the last eight years as that of “blacks in South Africa during the apartheid regime”.

He congratulated the people of Southern Kaduna for surviving the most difficult period of their existence in the hands of the APC-led administration of Nasir El-Rufai in the state, describing it as the hardest moment in the history of the people under any leader in the state.

Speaking as the chairman of a party organised by supporters of Senator Sunday Katung Marshal in Kaduna on Saturday, Sani said, “I am always so passionate about the people of Southern Kaduna because the area occupies a special place not only in Kaduna state but in Nigeria as a whole.”

He hailed the efforts of the people for standing their ground irrespective of any difficult situation to defend their ancestral land at all cost and their resolution to support PDP and its candidates in every election.

He enjoined the people to pray and support Senator Sunday Katung Marshal and other representatives from the area to succeed in their official assignments and ensure that they deliver their people from Egypt to the promised land.

The PDP gubernatorial candidate in the 2023 election in the state, Isa Ashiru, enjoined Senator Sunday Katung Marshal and other representatives from the zone to remain focused and deliver the people by doing all that is necessary to restore the good fortune of the area.

Senator Sunday Katung Marshal while responding, thanked the organisers of the programme, saying it was a challenge to him and other representatives from the area to deliver on their mandate and make life more meaningful to the people of the zone.

According to him, “I decided that I was going to commune with my brothers from the House of Representatives and State House of Assembly to ensure that we do an assessment of the Senatorial District to actually understand what the people really expect. That we have done, we have articulated it and all about security, with security, people will be able to carry out their businesses, go to farm and children go to school without any problem.”

Daily Post….

How the British introduced ethnicity, religion to Nigerian politics –Pogu, Middle Belt leader

National President of the Middle Belt Forum (MBF), Dr Bitrus Pogu, has accused the British of introducing ethnicity and religion to politics in Nigeria, thereby creating a cog in the wheel of development of the country.

In an interview with VINCENT KALU, the MBF leader noted fuel subsidy was a creation of fraudulent politicians.

Over 60 years of independence and over 50 years of civil war, why are ethnic and religious considerations still strong points in determining who gets what in this country?

It is unfortunate that many people, including you and I, have made wrong assumptions right from the onset. While Nigeria was under British rule before independence, the British had already created a dichotomy, which introduced religion and ethnicity in the formative years of the country we called Nigeria today. The British favoured the northern oligarchy, that is the Muslim north over other parts of the country before independence to the extent that even in 1957 and 1958, when the Willinks Commission was constituted to look at the plight of the northern minorities and southern minorities with a view to creating regions for them.

Reports that were disclosed after 50 years indicated clearly that there was a conspiracy among the colonial government, the Northern regional government and the Willinks Commission to ensure that no region was carved out of the north, so that the north would be favoured to take over the helms of affairs of Nigeria.

So, the northern minorities were used ab initio as a buffer to assist the north to be in control, though the census of 1958 or thereabouts indicated clearly that the Eastern Region and Berminda – by then it was one bloc – had the highest population followed by Western Region, and sadly following was the north, which included the Middle Belt area.

So, you can see that this issue of ethnicity and religion were established by the British even before independence, and at independence though the far north educationally and otherwise was disadvantaged, but everything was put in place to ensure that there was a dominating north in the whole equation, and the north that was aware of this situation thrived to ensure that this dichotomy is maintained all through this period.

Our brothers in the Middle Belt naively continued to toe the line of one monolith north, but the far north, the Muslim north has a different agenda and it was never like that. So, we have gone 60 years down the lane, religion and ethnicity were there at the beginning and they continued to manifest, and might continue to manifest unless we get a leader who will stamp his feet and say this is how things should be because even during the military regime, you can see the kind of constitution, which has a very strong northern Muslim undertone that was produced in 1999 under the supervision of General Abdusalam (retd), using Prof Awal Yadudu.

Ethnicity and religion were there before independence; they were there and practised and maintained by the far north, and naively, the Middle Belters were used as willing tools by the far north to achieve its objective. Today, whether it is the military, police or whatsoever, that manipulation seems to have gotten to the state where some elements from the north would now come and be lifted up on Nigeria to take total control. It is unfortunate that these are realities that are staring us in the face.

What do you think the President should do to bring unity to the country?

It is not for me to be his adviser. Mine is to say, let’s wait for the court because as far as I’m concerned, I don’t know who is eventually going to be the president because a lot of things that were unconstitutional were committed. And as far as I’m concerned, I’m still waiting for the rightful president to emerge through the court process. Some people have dismissed the court, but with the evidence coming out, I don’t think we can just wish away things like that.

However, setting up commissions here and there doesn’t solve the problem. The problem is change of behaviour by Nigerians. It is not the government that gave birth to Boko Haram, the Fulani herdsmen, militia that is killing people in the Middle Belt and in the south. It is Nigerians who want to dominate others by all means, using religion and ethnicity as tools. So whatsoever the president does, unless Nigerians are willing to be Nigerians and not to be Fulani, not to be Muslims, not to be Christians, not to be Kanuri, not to be Igbo, not to be Yoruba, not to be Middle Belters, etc, it won’t solve the problem. So, unless we all agree to be Nigerians because we are not yet a nation, we are just being patched up. Some people out there believe that they have Sharia, which is their main thing; some states in response to that says, theirs is a Christian state. Unless we all agree to be Nigerians and adhere to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, no commission, nothing will solve our problems because people fall for another constitution, which is different from the Nigeria constitution because they want to benefit from what it provides. Without the constitution, we are not one entity, but yet, both the one that wants to benefit and the one that wants to go by a different rule not by the constitution are the problem.

Tinubu is being applauded because of the reforms he is carrying out. What are your views?

I told you that the court will determine. However, what he has done so far seems to be more Nigerian than what Buhari has done. Fine and good, let’s wait and see what will become of this, whether he just wants to appease us, knowing that he has problem in the court so that he would get the sympathy of Nigerians. Some of the things he has done are good. If somebody does a good thing, you say it. In the same way, if somebody does what is bad, we say it. So, many of the things he has done are good. Many of the appointments he has made are also good; some of them have question marks because some of the characters have lot of baggage, but all the same let’s wait; time will tell. He as a person that was accused of so many things, including drugs. But people can repent and become even better people than those who have not done anything. Let us wait and see. What he has done, a lot of them are good, but there are a lot of things which need more tinkering here and there. You don’t lord fuel subsidy removal on people who cannot earn what can fuel their vehicles, and you say you have palliative. Which palliative?

So what is your view on the removal of fuel subsidy, because there are divergent opinions about it?

Nobody in Nigeria knows the truth about this fuel subsidy thing. I’m not a technical person. The crude oil is being extracted from our soil. Do you have to send it abroad, refine it and bring it back, and then use the international standard to determine what is ours, the price of fuel? This is our product. We killed our refineries deliberately. We were told that the money contributed or the shares bought by government in Dangote Refinery can even build a refinery. That means the government gifted that refinery to Dangote and now you slammed this money on Nigeria so that we pay and you remit to Dangote. When you look at government, and previous governments, you realise that we don’t love this country and we don’t love ourselves. We only want to impoverish people; torment people. Sometimes we even ask, what is the difference between democratic rule and civil rule? Are we being democratic? In what way? Has the government considered it the right thing to inform Nigerians, whose earnings, remunerations, salaries, etc can afford this kind of money on fuel and transportation?

I travelled home because a bosom friend of mine died last week, and to get to my village and come back, I spent up to N300, 000 on fuel. If I didn’t have this money, I wouldn’t have gone and it would have been better for me if I had to send N100, 000 to the person. But I ventured out and discovered that I was already in deep shit. It is terrible. Tell me how many people in this country earn up to N300, 000 in a month, which I spent on petrol just to travel to my village and come back? It’s a long journey. It is criminal, and nobody even knows the truth about the matter. This is our product and you are foisting on us international standard because you deliberately killed our refineries. It is unfortunate.

Why is it difficult for the anti-graft agencies to go after these people who are allegedly scamming the government and benefiting from the subsidy regime?

It is the government. Who is paying them? Is it not government? Anybody stealing our money through fuel subsidy, it is the government. The government is the one who determines and pays these people. Do we have to import fuel, which we extract locally? How much did Dangote spend to build that refinery? What is Nigeria’s budget every year? Is it too difficult to build new refinery or maintain the existing ones. It is just a fraud from the government and not from the so-called beneficiaries because the government determines who collects what and who gets paid. So the whole conspiracy is that we had and have bad leadership. I’m sorry to say this; many people castigated the late Gen Abacha and up till now still castigate him. When Abacha was in office, he was able to maintain a stable exchange rate, and even fuel price up till the time he died. Did he come from the moon? Those who were castigating him are today the people destroying this country. If Abacha could do it as a military Head of State, why couldn’t others do it?

How did this fuel subsidy come into our polity?

Fuel subsidy is a creation of fraudulent politicians and others who are benefiting from it. Unfortunately, the lifespan of majority of us is hardly beyond 70 years. Whatever one has accumulated would go down. Patriotism is lacking, we have people who come into politics just for making themselves richer than they were before. With this kind of development facing us, we cannot make progress.  Look at the solid minerals, which the Chinese, who are all over, are taking out of this country. You ask yourself, how much have we made from solid minerals over these years? It is very minimal and very unfortunate. So many things are wrong. Our problem is bad leadership. When we have the right leaders, things will turn around and all these wrongs can be done rightly and then Nigeria will be better, which is what all of us are looking out for.

Some people are calling for Tinubu to probe Buhari. What is your position?

I’m not somebody who will say probe this and that. All I’m saying is that we had a bad government, and that bad government gave birth to Tinubu himself. So, whatever that is happening, Tinubu is the product of it. If it was a different political platform, we can say, but Tinubu himself is a product of what Buhari did. He didn’t appoint Prof Yakubu; it was Buhari who appointed him. Tinubu, whether he probes Buhari or people around Buhari like Godwin Emefiele, the former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, it is to me immaterial; they are all one and the same because they are both All Progressives Congress (APC) members. I’m not an advocate of probe here, probe there. What I’m saying is let us have good governance and let government work properly and let Nigeria develop. I hold similar view with the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, who asked, will he leave his shop and go running after thieves? He said he would rather take care of his shop for it to grow. People have messed things up. Many of them deserve to face the law. We have institutions out there, but whether they can do that is another thing. But the important thing is, let us have good government.

Curled from The Sun Newspaper…..

JUST IN: Akpabio Emerges President of 10th Senate

Godswill Akpabio, a former minister of Niger Delta affairs, was chosen to serve as Senate President during the 10th Senate’s inauguration on Tuesday morning.

The 109 Senators had gathered to elect key officers for the National Assembly’s upper legislative chambers.

The two candidates for the position of number three citizen were Senator Godswill Akpabio, an APC legislator from Akwa Ibom North West, and Senator Abdulaziz Yari, an APC legislator from Zamfara North West.

You cannot Keep us in IDP Camps and declare Invaders occupying our communities as owners of land -Benue IDPs Cry out

Internally displaced persons in Benue have taken their protests against the conduct of the scheduled 2023 national population census to the Benue state office of the population commission.

The displaced persons majorly women holding different placards bearing anti census inscriptions said the government is keeping them in IDP camps while their former communities are occupied by invaders. They expressed fear that the invaders may be documented by the national population commission as the owners of the lands.

Speaking to Middle Belt Times reporter in Makurdi the Benue state capital on Thursday, one of the women who preferred to remain anonymous for fear of persecution said they are aware of plots to document terrorists occupying their communities as real owners of the land.

Recall that three weeks ago terrorists suspected to be Fulani militias attacked an IDP camp in Benue state killing no fewer than 50 displaced persons.

Benue state as well as neighboring Nasarawa, Plateau and Southern Kaduna have all had their shares of attacks largely blamed on Fulani terrorists leading to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of indigenous people.

With the government claiming it has budgeted $1.3b for the 2023 census, Nigerians are questioning the integrity of the exercise with many fearing that the outgoing government may have ulterior motives.